Wow. Just wow.
Some people are just not that fond of water, except for spreading it all over the floor while slurping it up…
This falls under the rubric of “Extreme Obamite Cleverness” (EOC).
For many years, Israel had a policy of demolishing the homes of individual Palestinians who had engaged in terrorist acts against Israel. This policy was quite controversial, and about ten years ago, Israel had largely abandoned it. But because of the increasing violence in Jerusalem and the West Bank, Prime Minister Netanyahu ordered its full reinstatement. (h/t Weasel Zippers)
Mind you, we are talking about demolishing individual homes of individuals who were proved to have engaged in terrorist acts, for instance Muhammed Naif El-Ja’abis, who had stolen an excavator on August 4, 2014, ran over pedestrians with it, injuring several and killing one, before ramming it into a public bus, overturning the bus and then hitting it repeatedly with the scoop.
Not good, says Jen Psaki, the spokeswoman of the U.S. State Department. In fact, very bad. According to her, targeting of individual proven perpetrators of terrorist attacks is “collective punishment.” She also bemoans the fact that the demolitions “would only heighten tensions in the region.”
One has to assume that, because she is spokeswoman for the Obama State Department, this is in fact the official position of the Obama administration.
Newsflash, Miss Psaki. Collective punishment refers to taking action against a group of people, not individuals, hence the use of the word “collective.” But given the Obamite track record vis-à-vis the Jewish state, my impression is that the term was used deliberately because the 1949 Geneva Convention defines collective punishment as a war crime. The underlying formula is pretty simple: Israel + any act of self-defense against Palestinian terror = war crime.
I have the impression that far too many people accept this at face value. However, if one digs a little deeper, one finds out that, under some circumstances, the Geneva Convention actually permits reprisals. The definition of a reprisal is pretty clear, at least to me: “Reprisals refer to acts which are illegal if taken alone, but become legal when adopted by one state in retaliation for the commission of an earlier illegal act by another state.”
In my view, this definition fits the situation perfectly, to wit:
- Earlier illegal act: Muhammed Naif El-Ja’abis carried out a terror attack with a stolen excavator, killing at least one Israeli and wounding several.
- Reprisal, made legal by the initial illegal act: the Israelis demolish his home.
Psaki’s use of the term collective punishment instead of reprisal, especially without mentioning the earlier terror attack, continues the long Obamite tradition of demonizing Israel and giving the Palestinians a free pass. And that attitude, not the Israelis’ reprisals against individual terrorists, “heighten tensions in the region.”
Sylvia Burwell, a loyal Obama apparatchik who was appointed as Secretary of Health and “Human” Services in June 2014, has her priorities perfectly straight. On November 11, she reiterated that one of her goals is give Obamacare to illegal immigrants. Supposedly, we need to take this step “as a nation.” On the other hand, she is less than concerned over the plight of American citizens in rural areas where local hospitals, their main source of care, are being driven to extinction by the demands of Obamacare. Rural residents in many areas now have to drive long distances to find care, and the time lost sometimes translates to permanent injury or even death. This storm has already swept through Tennessee, Kentucky, Indiana and Colorado, but never fear! Burwell assures us that HHS will “work to incorporate feedback” from rural hospitals on how it’s going, adding smugly: “Transition takes time.” That seems to be her way of being “particularly acutely focused” on the challenges facing rural hospitals.
Nice thought. But reality always finds a way to intrude.
To quote Kentucky State Auditor Adam Edelen: “I don’t want to be in a Kentucky where a farmer has to bleed out in a field because he doesn’t have access to a rural hospital, or a woman with a troubled pregnancy can’t get the help she needs to deliver a healthy baby.”
Adds Janis Orlowski, chief medical officer for the Association of American Medical Colleges. ‘There’s a “golden hour” after heart attacks, trauma and stroke in which treatment is needed to prevent loss of heart muscle and brain tissue.’ In other words: too long a ride to a hospital, and you risk permanent damage or death.
Makes perfect sense. Medical care for illegals (i.e. potential Democrat voters) but not for rural Americans.
Seems like Burwell is the perfect replacement for what’s-her-face.
What next? Obamacare for drug cartel members and for ISIS, in the hope that they will be grateful and start making nice?
Here’s one I never knew about. (Well, one of many…) The Czech composer Antonín Dvořák (1841-1904) had composed a tribute to the American flag. It was to have been performed at the World’s Columbian Exposition in 1892 that commemorated the 400th anniversary of the European discovery of America.
In 1891, Dvořák ranked among the leading European musical luminaries. As such, he was invited to the United States to become director of the National Conservatory of Music of America in New York City. He lived and worked in this country for two and a half years, composing some of his most famous music such as the Ninth Symphony (From the New World and the American String Quartet.
Thought I would rerun this February 2012 rant…
Barack Obama has been busy denouncing traditional American values, using phrases like “they’ve never really worked.” He has touched on this topic many times and in many ways, but the underlying message is always the same. American individualism is bogus. America’s dizzying successes have not really been the result of individual effort. An individual is an integral part of a web and never can accomplish anything alone. Thus collectivism – collective thinking, collective action, collective production – under Obama’s benevolent guidance, is the only way to go. Hence Obama’s stated desire to be a “transformational President.”
Some folks beg to differ, including John Steinbeck.
Herewith some hard-hitting lines from Section 1, Chapter 13 of East of Eden, which I had reread recently and couldn’t put down, so brilliant a tome it is:
Sometimes a kind of glory lights up the mind of a man. It happens to nearly everyone. … And then – [comes] the glory – so that a cricket song sweetens his ears, the smell of the earth rises chanting to his nose, and dappling light under a tree blesses his eyes. Then a man pours outward, a torrent of him, and yet he is not diminished. And I guess a man’s importance in the world can be measured by the quality and number of his glories. It is a lonely thing but it relates us to the world. It is the mother of all creativeness, and it sets each man separate from all other men.
I don’t know how it will be in the years to come. There are monstrous changes taking place in the world, forces shaping a future whose face we do not know. Some of these forces seem evil to us, perhaps not in themselves but because their tendency is to eliminate other things we hold good. It is true that two men can lift a bigger stone than one man. A group can build automobiles quicker and better than one man, and bread from a huge factory is cheaper and more uniform. When our food and clothing and housing all are born in the4 complication of mass production, mass method is bound to get into our thinking and to eliminate all other thinking. In our time mass of collective production has entered our economics, our politics, and even our religion, so that some nations have substituted the idea collective for the idea G-d. This in my time is the danger. There is great tension in the world, tension toward a breaking point, and men are unhappy and confused.
At such a time it seems natural and good to me to ask myself these questions. What do I believe in? What must I fight for and what must I fight against?
Our species is the only creative species, and it has only one creative instrument, the individual mind and spirit of a man. Nothing was ever created by two men. There are no good collaborations, whether in music, in art, in poetry, in mathematics, in philosophy. Once the miracle of creation has taken place, the group can build and extent it, but the group never invents anything. The preciousness lies in the lonely mind of a man.
And now the forces marshaled around the concept of the group have declared a war of extermination on that preciousness, the mind of man. By disparagement, by starvation, by repressions, forced direction, and the stunning hammerblows of conditioning, the free, roving mind is being pursued, roped, blunted, drugged. It is a sad suicidal course our species seems to have taken.
And this I believe: that the free exploring mind of the individual human is the most valuable thing in the world. And this I would fight for: the freedom of the mind to take any direction it wishes, undirected. And this I must fight against: any idea, religion, or government which limits or destroys the individual. This is what I am and what I am about. I can understand why a system built on a pattern must try to destroy the free mind, for that is one thing which can by inspection destroy such a system. Surely I can understand this, and I hate it and I will fight against it to preserve the one thing that separates us from the uncreative beasts. If the glory [of the free mind] can be killed, we are lost.
Thus a Nobelist who had to work hard for everything, to another Nobelist who has had everything handed to him, including the Prize.
I keep thinking about Barack Obama’s dilemma represented by his “thumping,” his “mega-defeat.” (That’s not me talking: those are the words of the veteran Democratic strategist James Carville, so don’t anyone go accusing me of racism, or something.) What is Obama going to do? How will he govern? His previous attitude had been pretty much true to his declaration “I won”, but now that there’s the (Republican) devil to pay and no pitch hot, will he negotiate with those who hold differing perspectives on life and governance? And will he do so in good faith?
Good questions all.
From where I am sitting, it does not look good. When you wish to be transformative, you are generally not talking about being transactional: that is to say, willing to work productively with others. Moreover, if you think of yourself as being on the right side of history, you put yourself in the same league with every self-annointed visionary who claims to know the future and therefore arrogates to himself the right to drive things in a particular direction. Not very good company, all those true believers. Just look at the historical record.
But I can justify my pessimism by more mundane means. Many commentators have described aspects of Obama’s personality as narcissistic (Charles Krauthammer) or even malignantly narcissistic (James Lewis). I don’t like psychologizing about people I have not assessed myself, but I have to admit that sometimes the symptoms are so obvious, even from afar, that something can be said. And, in my view, malignant narcissism is a good fit. In which case, a question like “Does Obama even know how to negotiate?” (Megan McArdle) is a very good one. And even Chris Matthews, the quintessential Obama workhorse, hit the nail on the head in this brief but remarkably accurate rant.
So, whether the primary problem here is ideological or developmental, I suspect that, over the next two years, we are in for a very rough ride.
On the other hand, with both houses of Congress and most gubernatorial mansions now in the hands of “the enemy of the people,” much of Obama’s narcissisistic rage may be dissipated or at least contained. This has already happened to some degree: though the 112th and 113th Congresses have been scoffed at as do-nothing Congresses, they were in fact nothing of the sort. They managed to largely block Obama’s compulsion to be “on the right side of history,” which is already a very great deal. One can only hope that this worthy labor will continue, with happy results for this country.